Watts Bar Reservoir

Ecological health rating

The overall ecological health condition for Watts Bar Reservoir rated at the low end of the fair range in 2008, comparable to results from previous dry, low flow years (2000, 2002, and 2006). The reservoir ratings for Watts Bar have fluctuated between a “high fair” and poor and have generally followed reservoir flow conditions. The indicator most responsive to flow is dissolved oxygen.

Watts Bar Reservoir Ecological Health Ratings, 1994-2008

Click chart for raw data.

The table below shows the ratings for individual ecological health indicators at Watts Bar in 2008. These ratings are briefly explained in the paragraphs that follow.

Monitoring locations	Dissolved oxygen	Chlorophyll	Fish	Bottom life	Sediment
Ecological Health Indicators for Watts Bar Reservoir, 2008
Forebay	Poor	Fair	Fair	Poor	Good
Mid-reservoir	Fair	Poor	Fair	Fair	Good
Tennessee River inflow			Good	Poor
Clinch River inflow			Fair	Fair
Dissolved oxygen Dissolved oxygen rated poor at the forebay and fair at the mid-reservoir monitoring location. Dissolved oxygen typically rates good at the mid-reservoir location, but ratings have varied between good, fair, and poor at the forebay, primarily due to reservoir flows. Poorer DO conditions occur as a result of reduced flows through the reservoir during dry conditions. TVA has installed aeration equipment to add oxygen to the deep water above Watts Bar Dam and to improve conditions immediately downstream Learn more about these improvements here. Chlorophyll Chlorophyll rated at the upper end of the fair range at the forebay and poor at the mid-reservoir location because of elevated concentrations. Annual average chlorophyll concentrations have fluctuated through time at the forebay, with no specific trend of increase or decreasing. Chlorophyll has shown an overall trend of increasing concentrations at the mid-reservoir site since monitoring began in 1991. Fish The fish assemblage rated good at the Tennessee inflow and at the upper end of the fair range at the Clinch inflow. The fish assemblage rated fair at the forebay and mid-reservoir locations because of the fair diversity of fish and a high composition of tolerant individuals. Better fish diversity at the other locations resulted in higher ratings. Bottom life Similar to most previous years, bottom life rated poor at the forebay and Tennessee inflow locations and fair at the mid-reservoir location. Historically, bottom life rated poor at the Clinch inflow location. However, since 2004, bottom life at the Clinch inflow has rated fair due to an increase in the density and diversity of organisms in the samples collected from the reservoir bottom. Sediment Sediment quality rated good at the forebay and mid-reservoir locations because no PCBs or pesticides were detected, and no metals had elevated concentrations. Low levels of PCBs and chlordane, a pesticide previously used to control termites and crop pests, were detected in some previous years at both locations. Lindane, an agricultural insecticide, was detected in 2006 in sediments collected from the forebay. See definitions of ecological health indicators and monitoring locations.

Fish consumption advisories

Watts Bar Reservoir TVA maintains a program to examine contaminants in fish fillets from TVA reservoirs and their major tributary streams on a rotational basis. The data collected from this program is distributed to the state officials who are responsible for placing or removing fish tissue consumption advisories on those bodies of water. For information on advisories currently in effect for Watts Bar Reservoir, visit the Water Quality Division of Tennessee Department of Environment & Conservation’s web page. http://www.tn.gov/environment/water.shtml